Tag Archives: eReading, eBooks

Papyrus, cuneiform, rice paper, vellum…

ebooks, eReading

ebooks, eReading

Papyrus, cuneiform, rice paper, vellum

February 23, 2009

Papyrus, cuneiform clay tablets, rice paper, palm leaves, tree bark, vellum, deer skin, decorative gilt leather, chiseled marble, copper plates, silk scrolls for fastidious delectation, and so on. Electrons, ebooks, will find their role and level.

One thing all these FORMS of reading demonstrate is that the nature and experience of reading has through the centuries assumed numerous physical shapes. Not everyone will want to make the transition, and not for every type of book. Literary and artistic, cultural works, especially, will continue to preserve and honor, at times, the exceptional qualities of high weight and exotic papers. Under all the Forms, Platonic, the experience of the Archetype, the Idea, if you will, prevails and will continue… in the mind of a human being.

Those who worry about the demise of the book should take heart from history. But why waste so many trees on manuals, pulp fiction, the required textbooks that the overburdened backs of school children lug around, unread — and the ephemeral newspapers that more and more people read online?

Call me old fashioned and nostalgic, but I hope we’ll always hold some books worthy of time-honored paper, linen, and vellum, as an art form, in its own right, if nothing else.

 

2 Comments

Filed under eReading, eBooks

Hard to Hear a New Voice

ebooks, eReading

ebooks, eReading

Hard to Hear a New Voice

February 18, 2009

As I’ve mentioned, I’ve now read books on a digital device for over a decade. I started with the original Palm PDA, the green one, a piece of ancient technology. I then progressed up the scale with two subsequent Palms and now have the Sony Reader PRS-5o5, which seems to me an incredible leap forward.

I’ve read everything on one device or another, including the following books, or large sections of them: Shakespeare’s King Lear, Macbeth, Chaucer, Cicero, Milton, numerous writings of Martin Luther, Joel Barlow, Philip Freneau, Thomas Carlyle’s Sartor Resartus, and over the years more than I can immediately remember. Most recently, I’ve read D. H. Lawrence, Studies in Classic American Literature, a book I always wanted to get around to reading, though he was never one of my literary heroes: “It is hard to hear a new voice… We just don’t listen.”

I think something like that has happened with eReaders, as it has with literature and poetry, but it’s changing as the technology has improved. The Kindle didn’t appeal to me given the required uploading of one’s own documents, and downloading them back to the device. I chose the Sony Reader because I believe it’s more flexible. I have an existing library of over a thousand books from Gutenberg.org and all over the Net, including some I’ve scanned myself. I wanted more control over my library than I ultimately felt the Kindle and other eReaders would allow me.

Sony’s software, though, has problems that get in the way of the experience of reading, requiring far too much tinkering around to copy files already sorted on one’s hard drive into “collections.” They’ve been criticized too, perhaps justly, for trying to corner the market in their own way. I think Sony has a chance of beating the Kindle and other devices, if it allows readers to hear the voices, some new, of the writers they want, not just those on its propriatary bookstore site, and develops a better software package to support the eReading experience. Only one or two updates during the last few years just isn’t enough support for serious improvement to take place. Sony needs to listen to and to hear its users if it’s ever really going to improve, and not just the technically inclined, but those who are serious readers of real literature, not the predominantly popular schlock they’re pushing on their elibrary bookstore.

Or Sony’s Reader will go, I suppose, the way of the US car industry… another company will figure it out.

Frederick Glaysher

 

Leave a Comment

Filed under eReading, eBooks

eReading is reading but then…

ebooks, eReading

ebooks, eReading

eReading is reading but then…

February 16, 2009

Reading and eReading are the same. But then… I have second thoughts. I suppose what I was thinking of was that eReading can be as absorbing and imaginative as conventional reading, yet there are advantages to eReading. Often, we think in reverse, about what is lost or diminished by a mechanical device. Yet I don’t want one or the other, but both. I’ve been regularly reading both ways for well over a decade, like everybody else, or at least so many people now.

I can flip things off the net, into a reader, and take it with me for snatches, long or short, when I can. Having hundreds of books and articles with me at all times has advantages. Depending on the inspiration of the moment, there’s always something to read, something I *want* to read, not a soiled, wornout magazine at the doctor’s office, a newspaper at the restaurant that has been handled by dozens of people that day, over their eggs and toast, french fries, and other greasy fare, coughing all over it. I find I actually can read that marginal article, which I wouldn’t have otherwise read, life being too busy since it’s a little lower on my list of priorities or interests. It’s easy to copy and paste it into my eReader to get around to maybe weeks or sometimes months later.

I can’t carry around hundreds of physical books, but I can carry around hundreds of books on my Palm or Sony Reader (PRS-505), anywhere I go.

And then the experience of ereading, I still believe, being tugged in both directions, isn’t quite the same. It can even seem better; right with the right book. The qualitative experience of reading an ebook is as deep and engaging as a printed volume.

Frederick Glaysher

 

Leave a Comment

Filed under eReading, eBooks

Qualitative Difference

ebooks, ereading

ebooks, eReading

February 11, 2009 Qualitative Difference

Reading is reading is eReading. And then I have afterthoughts. It is different. I “access” it in a different way. It feels different. Personally speaking, I wouldn’t want to read every book in digital format. Cover and paper weight have an aesthetic feel to them that steel and aluminum can’t provide. The leather case for the Sony Reader helps, but it’s still different.

Yet I found myself fully immersed in Cervantes’ imaginative world. The allegory took over and pulled me into it, as I eagerly suspended my disbelief. All the cliches about reading were just as true. I escaped from the harshness of reality into the perfection of an ideal world, relishing the delights of his intellect and humor.

Since I’ve read so many ebooks now on electronic devices than I can even recall, I continue to be surprised when I come across protestations against ereading. Even educated readers can be resistant to the idea that there is “no difference,” yet ereading is just as intellectually exciting, rewarding, invigorating, and capable of changing my consciousness.

Is all that self-evident? There are a lot of people resisting the notion… the experience.

I suppose my point is that the quality of the reading experience is or can be every bit as deep and reflective as with a physical book. One needn’t feel one has betrayed books and letters by admitting as much. Far from that, it is the experience that counts, and the cultivation of consciousness that only reading can provide.

Physically, there’s a qualitative difference; intellectually, reading is reading is eReading.

Frederick Glaysher

 

Leave a Comment

Filed under eReading, eBooks