Subject: Hate mail: talk.religion.bahai
From: FG@hotmail.com
Date: 1997/03/14
Message-ID: <5gcn3j$3e2$1@bilbo.reference.com>
Newsgroups: news.groups,soc.rights.human
[More Headers][Subscribe to news.groups]
IT SEEMS TO ME FAIR THAT OTHERS KNOW WHAT KIND OF FAN MAIL
I'M RECEIVING....
--
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 1997 15:58:55 -0700 (MST)
From: Joe User <user0@boola.frieze.com>
To: FG@hotmail.com
Subject: rantings and ravings of the fringe...
How to even start this message? I guess fairly (don't assume it will
stay that way, though - why should I offer you that when you don't give
it to others?).
Yes, it seems there is a basis for an unmoderated newsgroup such as you
are requesting. Do I want to see one? Not particularly, as I have to
interest. In fact, I have voted to abstain (for the meantime).
If it passes, I hope you are finally happy.
So you can then shut the hell up.
You mostly remind me of a child having a tantrum in a store because
mother won't let you run around screaming and cussing at the other
shoppers.
You really need to grow up!
Again, in all fairness, it does seem that, yes, maybe <some> of your
posts were rejected a little too easily. But what do you respond with?
Names, accusations, parralels to dictators bent on genocide, etc. You
could have pleaded with them to reconsider; you could have talked about
it, maybe compromising on *both* sides so that each is happy. Instead,
you scream "fascist" at the politest request of rewording!
I've read the lot of the rejected posts, and most of the dialogue on
news.groups. And, most often (about 95% of the time), you're kneejerk
reaction to diplomacy comes across as someone merely vying for attention.
Don't you understand what Baha'u'llah writes on how we should treat each
other, EVEN IF YOU YOURSELF FEELS WRONGED? Granted, I am just now
breaking that tenet myself, but I accept this, and I know I will pay
whatever consequence it brings. You didn't seem to have an argument to
the quotes from the Writings - then why don't you try to follow them?
They are the ideal, aren't they? But no, you bring the discussion down
to a mud-slinging brawl.
Turn that finger you have pointing at everyone who doesn't (or whoever
you perceive doesn't) support your comments as a whole back to yourself.
You honestly sound more fanatical (to the Nth degree so) in your rantings
than anybody else in this whole silly discussion has to date.
Although, I'm sure this will also probably fall on completely deaf ears,
and I'll be branded fanatic, lunatic, hypocrite (but at times aren't we
all to some degree as creatures capable of sin), yada yada yada. As I
don't particularly care for your slandering tactics, I am also sending
this from an account that has to relevance to me nor can be responded
to. If you still wish to respond, then you may do so in public manner,
and I will read it ANONYMOUSLY. This is to protect myself, as one of
your dirty tactics seem to be to use personalized e-mail against people to
suit your own goals.
And *you* are a Baha'i??? Shame on you!!! Shame!!!!!
FG
ROCHESTER HILLS, MICHIGAN USA
--
Posted using Reference.COM https://www.reference.com
Browse, Search and Post Usenet and Mailing list Archive and Catalog.
InReference, Inc. accepts no responsibility for the content of this posting.