The Baha'i Faith & Religious Freedom of Conscience

From: Michael McKenny <bn872@FreeNet.Carleton.CA>
Subject: Re: The root of the problem (was Re: Baha'u'llah's grammer and Mahdi's gwammer)
Date: Friday, September 10, 1999 5:57 PM
Greetings, Nima.
    Many thanks for posting this. It's always great to have the primary
source documents for such things.
    Yum. What a tasty little candy this is.
    In my opinion, if they really had proof you were some kind of drug
dealer or sexual predator, which is how that repeated comment about you
and the youth could be taken, then, perhaps, they ought to have notified
the police.
    I've just said that there's this theory that one may not be insulted
by errors in fact or by comments that are praiseworthy. So, if anyone
wishes to check, they'll see I don't do drugs and I'm only interested in
sex with consenting women of legal age. Such a letter couldn't insult me,
were I the one being backbit here.
    And, I guess in a Baha'i context, that's what's primarily at issue here,
isn't it? What possible legitimate reason could there be for such back-
biting? I wish I had more time. Oghma willing, I'll read some fascinating
replies to your post and this quite informative letter, in the sense of
demonstrating the backbiting being conducted by Baha'i institutions. I
look forward to those responses.
                                                     To A Better Future,
                                                          Michael 
 (nima_hazini@my-deja.com) writes:
> ----
> NATIONAL SPIRITUAL ASSEMBLY OF THE BAHA’IS OF AUSTRALIA
> INCORPORATED A.R.B.N. 009 727 128
> (Incorporated in the A.C.T.) (Liability of members limited)
> 
--
"My name's McKenny, Mike McKenny, Warrant Officer, Solar Guard."
       (Tom Corbett #1 STAND BY FOR MARS p2)
 

Homepage