The Baha'i Faith & Religious Freedom of Conscience

Date sent:      	Thu, 10 Apr 1997 09:23:41 -0400 (EDT)
From:           	bn872@freenet.carleton.ca (McKenny Michael)
To:             	bahai-st@johnco.cc.ks.us
Subject:        	Letter to UHJ and Reply
Copies to:      	talisman@umich.edu
Send reply to:  	bn872@freenet.carleton.ca
Greetings from Ottawa.
    Here's a copy of the letter sent to the Universal House of 
Justice on March 23rd and the reply. I've not studied the reply,
so I have no comment at this time. I believe the appendices to 
the reply are already well-known. If not, I'll post them soon.
If anyone wishes a copy of one or more of these and doesn't see
the desired appendex (ices) within say 24 hours, simply ask me
to send it (them).
                                     Happy Reading,
                                     Peace,
                                     Michael



To the Universal House of Justice
Greetings from Ottawa.
    In January when Auxiliary Board Member Susie Tamas met with
me she warmly encouraged me to present my concerns about the
Universal House of Justice to you. Throughout February she very 
attentively considered the preliminary drafts of the letter I 
began to compose in response. On reflection, moved by the spirit 
of this special period of the Fast, I came to perceive from her 
considered comments that I was trying to write to you from the 
head and that this was not enough.
    Aware of my imperfections, here I try also to open to you my 
heart.
    In the darkest hour before the dawn, when war seemed inevitable
and the prime minister of this country travelled to the capitals of 
the nuclear powers to plead for peace, I prayed to the beloved 
Guardian:
    "Dearest Shoghi Effendi, my understanding is that you have said 
quite clearly this cataclysm will come. Your words depict the 
falling of fearsome weapons of destruction upon our cities and the 
deaths of two thirds of the people of the world. Please, I beg you, 
would it not be better for us to be spared this devastation, for 
us to find a symbolic explanation of such frightful words than
for you to be confirmed as completely and literally correct by 
means of the murder of these billions of people?"
    My ardent prayer, often repeated at that time, was that God
demonstrate His all-compelling authority and might by inspiring us 
peacefully to transform this planet into that reflection of heaven
foretold in Sacred Scripture. I asked Him: "Is it not a greater 
sign of divine power and love to grant human leaders the imagination and
will to move ever more peacefully towards world peace than  through
inaction to provide the opportunity for the indescribable agonies of such
a holocaust? Is it not more befitting the Almighty, the Most Munificent
Creator of the Worlds to lead us to transform with our own hands
physically and spiritually the dark landscapes around our bodies and our
souls into the perfumed gardens visualized in the Writings than to watch
the burning craters appear, radiation ride the winds and the minority of
survivors driven rather than guided into the Cause of God?" 
     I was not alone. In every Terran language, from every land on   Earth
the pleas for peace were raised to Heaven. 
     And the Prime Mover, to the astonishment of the nations of the 
world, answered. That mortal man portrayed by Cold War rhetoric as 
the Evil Emperor was inspired to lead the way in the move to peace, 
even at the cost of his position and his Empire itself, an event 
perhaps without parallel in the annals of this world. And the very 
precious soul we call the Priceless Pearl did not insist on 
inflicting humanity with the literal fulfillment of his 
authoritative statements about weapons and death.
    Auxiliary Board Member Susie Tamas in response to concerns I
raised at what I considered a dangerously divisive impression that 
the definition of a true and loyal believer consisted in one's 
literal interpretation of the Word of God shared with me this 
passage which you wrote on March 6, 1982:
    "In considering the whole field of divinely conferred 
infallibility one must be careful to avoid the literal understanding and
petty mindedness that has so often characterized discussions of this
matter in the Christian world. The Manifestation of God (and to a lesser
degree, Abdul-Baha and Shoghi Effendi) has to convey tremendous concepts
covering the whole field of human life and activity to people whose
present knowledge and degree of understanding are far below His. He must
use the limited medium of human language against the limited and often
erroneous background of His audience's traditional knowledge and current
understanding to raise them to a wholly new level of awareness and
behaviour. It is a human tendency against which the Manifestation warns
us, to measure His statements against the inaccurate standard of the
acquired knowledge of mankind. We tend to take them and place them within
one or the other of the existing categories of human philosophy or science
while, in reality, they transcend these and will, if properly understood,
open new and vast horizons to our understanding.
    "Some sayings of the Manifestation are clear and obvious.
Among these are laws of behaviour. Others are elucidations which
lead men from their present level of understanding to a new one.
Others are pregnant allusions, the significance of which only 
becomes apparent as the knowledge and understanding of the reader
grow. And all are integral parts of one great Revelation intended
to raise mankind to a new level of its evolution."
    This uplifting of humanity is a process which seems to be 
continuing outside the Faith.
    The beloved Guardian says, "It should also be borne in mind that the
machinery of the Cause has been so fashioned, that whatever is deemed
necessary to incorporate into it in order to keep it in the forefront of
all progressive movements, can, according to the provisions made by
Baha'u'llah, be safely embodied therein." 
                                     (WOB 22-23)
    In 1988 in response to your call to summon the troops into the 
Cause of God by sharing with them the Peace Message, I presented a 
copy of this document to almost everyone I knew. I invited many of 
them to regular followup "Peace Talks" at my place. This resulted 
in some keen consideration of this Faith by people of capacity, 
members of many circles and organizations. Whatever the probability, it
was not impossible that some of these very active and capable individuals
could have ignited the fire of the love of the Glory of God within troops
of souls. When a non-Baha'i exposed that this Faith does not practise the
full equality of the sexes, none of these people could accept that the
Will of God for this Age could be so far from the forefront of all
progressive movements as to perpetuate the concept and the practice of
women being excluded from highest office.
     The spirit of this very communication, "The Promise of World 
Peace", moved the leaders of the Cold War beyond mistrust and the 
paralysis of will which had so divided and threatened humankind for 
decades. It would appear that the Cause of God today needs to be
uplifted above such mistrust and paralysis of will.  
     You called for: the submergence of theological differences, 
identification of and guidance by principle, the sweeping away of 
assumptions and formulae ceasing to promote the welfare of a 
continually evolving humanity, women to be welcomed into full 
partnership. 
     Indeed, you advised the rulers and peoples of this world:     
"The emancipation of women, the achievement of full equality
between the sexes, is one of the most important, though less
acknowledged prerequisites of peace." I am delighted to be able 
to tell you that almost everyone I know seems to agree with you 
on this point. The openness of my heart compels me to add that 
apparently no non-Baha'i I know accepts that the Baha'i Faith 
may claim to practise what it is preaching until women may serve 
on the Universal House of Justice. An assertion that somehow there 
may be equality of men and women with the highest positions 
reserved for men, draws forth scorn and demonstrates that this is 
a false religion ("By their fruits shall ye know them") of people 
"whose words exceed their deeds", a people given to Orwellian 
Newspeak, doubletalk and euphemism.
     Last year I learned of some of the energizing discoveries
made which facilitate our demonstration of the clearly expressed
principle of the equality of men and women that we may surpass 
that petty minded preference of an interpretation which not only
tasks reasonable thought when read in full, but tests souls
beyond their capacity, something God has urged us not to do. If
there is to be a choice between a literal application of the 
concept of infallibility and the implementation of such a basic 
principle as the equality of men and women, bearing in mind your 
own words concerning literalism and infallibility quoted above 
and the quote that "It is incumbent upon them who are in authority 
to exercise moderation in all things" (THE PROCLAMATION OF 
BAHA'U'LLAH p. 113) are we truly powerless to be people whose 
principled deeds clearly match our words? There is also the warning: "In
all matters moderation is desirable. If a thing is carried to excess, it
will prove a source of evil." (Quoted in BAHA'U'LLAH p. 46.) The chief
tidings in my prayer to you is that, in the estimation of troops, for us
to refuse to moderate our attachment to literal infallibility even when
this leads us to subservience to previous levels of understanding at
variance with Baha'u'llah's fundamental principle exposes the
unworthiness, the hypocrisy, the falsity of this Faith. 
     Many and varied are the words possible and my heart is
overwhelmed. How may I proceed when these eyes dim with tears?
Still, how may I not continue to pray as I prayed for the 
protection of this world and its peoples from impending 
devastation?
     You yourselves have drawn the connection between the full
equality of the sexes and peace, and presented the choice as to  
"Whether peace is to be reached only after unimaginable horrors 
precipitated by humanity's stubborn clinging to old patterns of
behaviour, or is to be embraced now by an act of consultative 
will."  
     The connection of these two points, the necessity of this
species to will to arise above old patterns of behaviour in order 
to avoid unimaginable horrors and the necessity to move beyond the
period of the restriction of women in order for there to be peace 
convulses my soul, because it is evident to non-Baha'i observers
that the community to which you directed the scrutiny of the 
nations is still bogged down in that anachronistic pattern of 
behaviour which has supreme authority in the grasp of men alone. 
     My heart is very perturbed both because I fear this has to
a significant extent delayed the creative and positive forces from
taking full advantage of the unexpected opportunity provided by 
the courage and vision of the Soviet leadership and because I am
aware of what seems a very unhealthy anticipation within the Faith 
for the chastisement of the peoples of the world who largely have 
ignored this latest Revelation.
     The anguished questions that follow may seem truly amazing.
However, I would not be opening fully to you my heart were I to
leave them unspoken. Is it really so unspiritual, is it worth the 
death penalty for individuals and the burning of cities that the 
literal words of the fundamental principle of the equality of the 
two sexes be seen as taking precedence over a narrowly literal 
perception of the Guardian's interpretation of those words of the 
Master which appear to refer to the House of Justice in Chicago? 
Is humanity to experience that catastrophe that the so-called Evil 
Emperor delayed, if he did not overcome it, or some other one, to 
cleanse the world of those so influenced by the Prince of Peace 
that they expect Baha'is to comply fully with His fundamental 
principle, although the world in the lifetime of the Blessed 
Beauty did not follow this principle, one reason, perhaps, for its 
gradual implementation? How may the troops pour in through the 
open gates of this Faith, while this drawbridge remains raised in 
their faces? 
    At this point I feel I must mention my father. You know I did
receive some advice that it was not a good idea to write to you,
and that if I did I ought to say what you'd find pleasing, as you 
may otherwise respond in the manner of historical Terran monarchs 
and view one daring to impart information you may not like to hear 
as quite a presumptuous fellow. Yet, how would I contribute to the 
proof we are leaving behind anachronistic habits if I remained 
silent or, according to past patterns of behaviour, concealed from 
the Source of All Good the real news of how this Faith is now 
becoming perceived by ordinary people? 
    Although I lived in the same house as my father until I was
twenty-three years old, I heard him say almost nothing about how
he spent his early 20s. This was a time of such intense experience
for him that he still does not speak of it, not even after the 
passage of fifty years. He, as so very many people at that time, 
had his life greatly impacted by events in the world at large. He 
left the family farm to participate in the defence of the Free 
World from one of this Century's most notorious examples of 
totalitarianism.
    The relevance of this is that this country, so extolled in the
Tablets of the Divine Plan for, among other things, its freedom, 
others in the Free World and those lands which experienced 
totalitarian regimes contain a lot of people who are quite 
unsympathetic to certain characteristics of those unpleasant 
administrations inflicting such anguish upon both their citizens 
and foreigners.
    Among these features is that old pattern of behaviour which
involves the control of information. My weeping heart leads me to
tell you very bluntly that my perception of people here is that no 
alleged details unflattering to this Faith can exceed in negative 
impact the fact that there is control of information within the 
Baha'i Faith. Forbidding the use of the word "censorship" and 
insisting upon the term "review" only seems to underline the 
very distasteful impression this gives of our Faith. It is the 
same with the term "exemption" being insisted on as a substitute 
for "excluded" in reference to women hitherto being prevented 
from serving on the Universal House of Justice.
    Very frankly, it is very difficult to see the distinction 
between such Baha'i practices and those directed by Goebbels 
which at length required the intervention of my father and many 
millions like him. I can not describe for you the extent of the 
impact it had on me when I learned that your initial response to 
the reception of the information that the Writings contain 
passages in which women are referred to as "men/rulers" and that 
it is quite likely that Abdul-Baha was speaking about the House 
of Justice in Chicago and not the Universal House of Justice at 
all was to prohibit the publication of this data. It may suffice 
for you to know that this was the principle reason I told 
Auxiliary Board Member Susie Tamas that a literal understanding of 
the infallibility of the Universal House of Justice would be 
contrary to the evidence of my senses. 
     Further, while the Constitution of the Universal House of
Justice contains as one of your powers and duties, "To safeguard
the personal rights, freedom and initiative of individuals," a
responsibility resonating strongly with peoples in this Century
which has endured such onerous oppression, you have made recent 
comments that may be perceived as a denunciation of "liberty", 
"liberalism" and "freedom".
     I can imagine no more effective means to inflict harm upon
this Faith than for someone to call a news conference and simply 
read quotes hostile to liberalism and liberty. Would you not be 
understood as demonstrating this reponsibility to protect personal 
rights was falling victim to euphemism and cause alarm that were 
God to permit you to direct the course of human affairs this would 
inflict upon the peoples of this planet a global oppression, 
compared to which the regionalized and relatively low tech regimes 
of the recent past would pale? 
      May I not pray that you in future remove such an opportunity
from anyone wishing harm upon this Cause, that however you raise
our understanding of the value of co-operation and harmony, you
keep before our eyes this shining jewel of individual rights and
freedoms for which my father endured so much and many others died? 
Will you join me in praying that the Blessed Beauty ever inspire      you
to guide humanity through insightful and imaginative vision, embracing
fundamental principle and winning by this means the admiration and
wholehearted support of those comprising a maturing species, as remote as
possible from the totalitarian tendency to focus on literal details
defining legitimate authority and the insistence upon the obedience of
anything at all? So very many people yearn to witness the evidences of the
influence of the Higher Worlds that they may exert all their energies
backing something so constructive and positively creative. Very few of
these can see in the tedious reiteration of an insistence that there is
yet another Centre which must be obeyed whatever it may command anything
more than the basis for the commission of immoral and unethical deeds. The
fact that women have been prohibited from service on the Universal House
of Justice and that Scriptural grounds to lift this prohibition  hitherto
have been concealed from the generality of the believers does nothing to
allay what ought to be quite incredible apprehensions about our similarity
to other totalitarian systems uttering such assertions and staining the
annals of history with unprincipled behaviour. 
     One of the most illuminating events in the more than fifteen
decades of the history of the New Era was that glorious spiritual 
act by the Hands of the Cause of God on the occasion of the
election of the Universal House of Justice. In a deed elevated
above traditional human temptation to seek to retain control of
authority, these laudable souls not only permitted the Supreme
Body to replace them in directing the affairs of the Cause of God, 
but went so far as to ask not to be elected to the Universal
House of Justice. This happening has a profound influence on the
soul of any seeker of truth receiving word of it. How likewise
must be the impact of each example of the ability of the Prince of 
Peace to elevate His declared followers, and, especially, those 
wielding authority within His Faith, above the normal manner of 
human behaviour. May we not expect the peoples of the world to 
respond very positively to every proof that this is indeed a New 
World Order? 
     In conclusion, here is the gist of my ardent prayers for the 
progress of the Cause of God and the protection of the peoples of 
this planet from cataclysm, death and destruction:
     May we please receive the communication that from now on 
women may also be considered eligible for membership on the 
Universal House of Justice?
     May we please be notified of the suspension of the temporary 
policy of review?
     May we please be guided to an understanding of co-operation
and harmony consistent with "the personal rights, freedom and 
initiative of individuals", and sensitive to the significance in
the Free World of the terms and concepts "freedom", "liberty" and 
"liberalism"? 
     May we please delight in the vision of human harmony radiating 
from the World Centre, embracing in a wondrously rich garden the 
great variety of human thought bestowed upon this species by an
Ever-Loving, Most Bounteous, All-Powerful Creator?
     May the Most Merciful Lord allow the intent of this message
to transcend all the barriers to effective communication and permit
you to see what is in my heart that you may know for certain that 
the above was written only with the purpose of supporting you in
guiding humanity towards what is truly worthy of being described 
as an ever-advancing civilization and a Golden Age. 
    "I beseach Thee, O my God, by that Letter which, as soon as it
proceeded out of the mouth of Thy will, hath caused the oceans to
surge, and the winds to blow, and the fruits to be revealed, and 
the trees to spring forth, and all past traces to vanish, and all
veils to be rent asunder, and them who are devoted to Thee to
hasten unto the light of the countenance of their Lord, the
Unconstrained, to make known unto me what lay hid in the treasuries
of Thy knowledge and concealed within the repositories of Thy 
wisdom. Thou seest me, O my God, holding to Thy Name, the Most 
Holy, the Most Luminous, the Most Mighty, the Most Great, the Most 
Exalted, the Most Glorious, and clinging to the hem of the robe to
which have clung all in this world and in the world to come."
                                     Peace,
                                     Michael.
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 97 13:52:22 IDT
From: secretariat@bwc.org ("Baha'i World Centre")
To: bn872@freenet.carleton.ca

                                     8 April 1997


Transmitted by email:  bn872@freenet.carleton.ca
Mr. Michael McKenny
Canada
Dear Baha'i Friend,
     The Universal House of Justice has asked us to respond on its 
behalf to your email message of 23 March 1997, in which you share 
your thoughts and suggestions on a number of issues related to the 
development of the Cause. The sincerity of your struggle to 
understand, both intellectually and spiritually, the implications 
of Baha'u'llah's Revelation is apparent both from your message and 
from your desire to respond to the comments of the Auxiliary Board 
member Mrs. Susanne Tamas. It is hoped that the comments which 
follow and the related enclosures will be of assistance to you in 
this effort.
     As it is not possible to go into all of the detailed points 
raised in your letter, the House of Justice believes that it will 
be most helpful to address two specific issues which are clearly of 
particular concern to you.  These are the question of the 
ineligibility of women for membership on the Universal House of 
Justice and that of the temporary policy requiring pre-publication
review of works on the Faith written by Baha'is.
   With respect to the first of these two subjects, we have been 
asked to enclose two documents which you will find especially 
relevant:
 1.  a copy of a letter of 31 May 1988 written by the House of 
     Justice to the National Spiritual Assembly of New Zealand, 
     which reviews in detail the documentation related to the 
     subject of the principle in the Faith's teaching which limits 
     membership on the Universal House of Justice to men; and
 2.  a related document recently prepared by the Baha'i World 
Centre's Research Department on the concept of "'umumi," a term 
which is central to an understanding of this same subject.
     With respect to the second of the two issues mentioned, we 
enclose a lengthy extract from a letter of 29 December 1988 
written on behalf of the House of Justice to the followers of 
Baha'u'llah in the United States on the subject of individual 
rights and freedoms.  As you will note, this statement addresses 
directly the question of the continuing necessity at this stage in
the evolution of the Cause, for the policy of pre-publication 
review.
Mr. Michael McKenny                                  8 April 1997
                                     Page 2

     The House of Justice believes that, in studying these 
documents, you should challenge yourself to reflect deeply on 
the vital importance, to one's spiritual life and intellectual 
advancement, of the Faith's teaching that each individual must 
investigate truth for himself or herself.  Specifically, in the
light of current Internet discussions in which you are a 
participant, you will want to consider carefully and prayerfully 
the extent to which your current thinking may have been 
influenced by the views of individuals who have presented 
themselves -- and perhaps, to some extent, been accepted by you -- 
as "scholarly authorities" on the Baha'i teachings.  While all of 
us can benefit in our study of the Revelation from consulting a 
range of views held by other believers, Baha'u'llah calls us to 
maintain a condition of spiritual autonomy as a basic prerequisite 
for spiritual search, "For the faith of no man can be conditioned 
by any one except himself." 
          note Gleanings from the Writings of Baha'u'llah, p. 143
   The Cause of God, encompassing teachings, laws and institutions, 
has been given to us one and whole by its divine Creator. To the 
challenge of demonstrating this distinguishing unity of the Cause a 
global community has brought the testimony of a century and a half 
of heroism and of sacrifice of self.  Only those influences which 
lead us more deeply into a comprehension of the organic wholeness 
of Baha'u'llah's Revelation -- and thus into a fuller consciousness 
of our own integrity as individuals -- can rightly claim to merit
our attention.
   The House of Justice assures you of its ardent prayers at the 
Holy Threshold that Baha'u'llah will surround you with His 
blessings and will confirm your devoted efforts to deepen your 
understanding of His purpose.
                                    With loving Baha'i greetings,
                                    Department of the Secretariat
Enclosures 3 (appended)




warmest, 
Susan 

Homepage